Nominee Evaluation Form Awesomeness Ambassador Awards Nominee Evaluation Form Thank you for your time, support, and dedication to the Awesomeness Ambassador Awards. Your role in this process is vital to recognizing and celebrating the outstanding contributions of our nominees. Please read each nomination carefully. The evaluation form mirrors the questions from the application to ensure alignment and consistency. Use the provided rubric to assign a score to each response based on the criteria outlined. Be as objective as possible, relying solely on the information presented in the nomination. Your thoughtful evaluations help ensure a fair and meaningful selection process. Thank you again for your commitment! Your Name * First Name Last Name Nominee's Name * First Name Last Name LEADERSHIP & IMPACT * How has the nominee demonstrated leadership that has positively influenced their community, workplace, or area of impact? We’re looking for specific examples of initiatives, actions, or contributions that highlight their leadership and the results or changes that followed. EXCELLENT (4 points) - Demonstrates exceptional leadership with a significant positive impact on their community or field. GOOD (3 points) - Shows strong leadership with notable contributions to their community or field. MODERATE (2 points) - Demonstrates some leadership qualities and has made a moderate impact. Shows potential for continued growth and influence.. MINIMAL (1 point) - Demonstrates limited leadership experience with minimal impact. May have taken on small roles or responsibilities. NOT EVIDENT (0 points) – The nomination lacks clear examples or evidence to support this criterion. COMMITMENT TO SERVICE * In what ways has the nominee demonstrated a strong commitment to serving others? Has the nominee worked to elevate voices from historically excluded or marginalized communities? We’re looking for specific examples of how they have contributed their time, skills, or resources to uplift individuals or communities, and the impact of their efforts. EXCELLENT (4 points) - Consistently engages in activities that uplift and serve others, going above and beyond expectations. GOOD (3 points) - Regularly participates in service-oriented activities benefiting others. MODERATE (2 points) - Occasionally involved in service activities with some positive outcomes. MINIMAL (1 point) - Rarely involved in service activities or lacks evidence of meaningful community engagement. NOT EVIDENT (0 points) – The nomination lacks clear examples or evidence to support this criterion. CREATIVITY, INNOVATION, & FUTURE IMPACT * How has the nominee demonstrated creativity or innovation in their work, and what are their plans for lasting impact? We’re looking for specific examples of new ideas, bold solutions, or fresh approaches they’ve introduced, and how they intend to sustain or scale their efforts moving forward. EXCELLENT (4 points) - Demonstrates original and visionary thinking, with bold ideas or solutions that show clear potential for long-term impact. Their approach is resourceful, courageous, and thoughtfully designed for sustainability through partnerships, funding, or scalability. GOOD (3 points) - Shows creative thinking and innovative problem-solving with defined plans that suggest continued contributions or influence over time. MODERATE (2 points) - Some creative or forward-thinking elements are present but plans for sustainability or future impact are vague or underdeveloped. MINIMAL (1 point) - Limited creativity or innovation, with little indication of long-term influence or strategic planning. NOT EVIDENT (0 points) – The nomination lacks clear examples or evidence to support this criterion. PERSONAL JOURNEY & AUTHENTICITY * What part of the nominee’s personal journey makes their story stand out? We’re looking for specific experiences, challenges, or turning points that shaped who they are—and how their authenticity has guided their impact on others. EXCELLENT (4 points) - Shares a compelling, heartfelt story that highlights their personal growth and values, with a clear connection to their actions and impact. The narrative is authentic, emotionally resonant, and inspiring. GOOD (3 points) - Provides a sincere, well-articulated story with specific examples that show personal development and purpose-driven contributions. MODERATE (2 points) - Shares a basic or general story with limited detail or emotional connection; impact is implied but not clearly illustrated. MINIMAL (1 point) - Story lacks depth, clarity, or authenticity; little personal insight or connection to impact. NOT EVIDENT (0 points) – The nomination lacks clear examples or evidence to support this criterion. ALIGNMENT WITH IRAM MEHAL COACHING VALUES & MISSION * How does the nominee’s mindset, actions, or leadership reflect the values of Iram Mehal Coaching? We’re looking for specific examples that demonstrate how they embody confidence, empower others, lead with intention, or contribute to meaningful, lasting change. EXCELLENT (4 points) - Fully embodies the core values of Iram Mehal Coaching—confidence, empowerment, emotional elevation, intentional leadership, and legacy-driven impact. Demonstrates a strong commitment to personal growth and uplifting others in both word and action. GOOD (3 points) - Clearly reflects most of Iram Mehal Coaching’s values in their actions and mindset, with a visible focus on growth, purpose, and community. MODERATE (2 points) - Shows some alignment with the values, but implementation or consistency is limited. Personal growth or intentional leadership may be present but underdeveloped. MINIMAL (1 point) - Actions and mindset do not fully reflect Iram Mehal Coaching’s values; little evidence of alignment with the mission of growth, empowerment, or impact. NOT EVIDENT (0 points) – The nomination lacks clear examples or evidence to support this criterion. Do you believe this nominee should be considered for special recognition during the awards ceremony? * SELECT 1 OPTION ONLY Philanthropy Community Service Leadership Innovation Empowerment Lifetime of Awesomeness No Special Recognition Recommended SCORING GUIDE * 18–20 Points: Strong Candidate — Highly recommended for selection. 15–17 Points: Solid Candidate — Recommended for selection. 12–14 Points: Consider with Caution — May require further review or conversation. Below 12 Points: Not Recommended — Does not currently meet the standards of the program. Would you like to share any additional comments or feedback about this nominee? (Optional) Use this space to share any final thoughts, insights, or context that may support the evaluation of this nominee. This could include standout qualities, specific anecdotes, or overall impressions not captured elsewhere in the form. Acknowledgement * By checking this box, I confirm that I have reviewed this nomination thoroughly and evaluated it in a fair and objective manner. I affirm that I have no conflicts of interest or personal bias related to this nominee, and my assessment is based solely on the information provided in the application. Thank You!Your evaluation has been successfully submitted.Thank you for your time, thoughtfulness, and commitment to recognizing excellence through the Awesomeness Ambassador Awards. Your careful review and objective insights play a vital role in honoring individuals who make a meaningful impact in our community. We deeply appreciate your contribution to this important process.
